Experimental study of the effect of velocity on dynamic trim, as a measure of the occurrence of longitudinal instability in a planing boat example using sea trial tests.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 AUT

2 Imam Hossein comprehensive university

3 NEDSA research center

Abstract

One of the undesirable phenomena in the achievement of planing vessels at high speeds is the phenomenon of longitudinal instability. This phenomenon, which is in fact an unstable coupling between heave and pitch, causes damage to the vessel, equipment and crew. In order to evaluate and accurately calculate the speed of occurrence of this phenomenon in the design stages, it is necessary to perform numerical analysis or model testing. Therefore, the existence of a valid data set to validate these analyzes, especially numerical analysis is essential.

In this paper, by setting the dynamic trim as a criterion for the occurrence of porpoising in a planing boat, the amount of this trim at different speeds is measured on a sample of a cougar boat without steps in the sea. These results show that the dynamic trim has an increasing trend with increasing speed and after the float is in planing mode, it gradually decreases and tends to an almost constant value at high speeds.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. T. Celano, The prediction of porpoising inception for modern planing craft, SNAME Trans 106 (1998) 269-292.
  2. Day JP, Haag RJ (1952).”Planing boat porpoising. Thesis, Webb Institute of Naval Architecture”.
  3. Celano T (1998). “The prediction of purposing inception for modern planing craft”. SNAME Trans 106:269–292.
  4. Troesch AW (1992) on the hydrodynamics of vertically oscillating planing hulls. J Ship Res 36:317–331.
  5. Troesch AW, Falzarano JM (1993).”Modern nonlinear dynamical analysis of vertical plane motion of planning hulls”. J Ship Res

37:189–199.

  1. Martin M (1978).”Theoretical determination of porpoising instability of high-speed planing boats”. J Ship Res 22:32–53.
  2. Ikeda Y, Katayama T (2000).” Purposing oscillations of very-high-speed

Marine craft”. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 358:1905–1915.

  1. Salvesen N, Tuck EO, Faltinsen OM (1970).” Ship motions and sea loads”. Trans SNAME 78:250–287.
  2. Fujino M, Chiu FC (1983) “Vertical motions of high-speed boats in head sea and wave loads”. J Soc Nav Arch Jpn 154:151–162.
  3. Chiu FC, Fujino M (1989) “Nonlinear prediction of vertical motions and wave loads of high-speed crafts in head sea”. Int Shipbuild Prog 36:193–232.
  4. Katayama T, Hinami T, Ikeda Y (2000). “Longitudinal motion of super high-speed planning craft in regular head waves”. In: 4th Osaka colloquium on seakeeping performance of ships, 2000, pp 214–220.
  5. Garme K, Rose´n A (2003) “Time-domain simulations and full-scale trials on planning craft in waves”. Int Shipbuild Prog 50:177–208.
  6. Katayama T, Taniguchi T, Habara K (2010) “Tank tests to estimate onset of dynamic instabilities of high-speed planning craft”. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Chesapeake power boat symposium, St. Johns College, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.
  7. Faltinsen OM (2005) “Hydrodynamics of high-speed marine vehicles”. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  8. Zhao R, Faltinsen OM, Haslum HA (1997) “A simplified nonlinear analysis of a high-speed planning craft in calm water”. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST ‘97), Sydney, Australia, July 1997, pp 431–438.